Spirit of 1776: Revolutionary Spycraft Family Workshop

Revolutionary Spycraft Family Workshop is free with museum admission. Patrons can drop in and participate any time within the window of 11AM–3PM.

Don your tricorn hat and join us for a four-day exploration of Revolutionary America, led by living historian Michael Carver, the Regimental Brewmeister!

FULL SCHEDULE

Lecture on the Role of Jews in the American Revolution
Thursday, December 3 | 5PM

18th Century Tavern Night
Friday, December 4 | 5–8PM

Revolutionary Spycraft Family Workshop
Saturday, December 5 | 11AM–3PM

18th Century Surveying Demonstration
Sunday, December 6 | 11AM–2PM

The Spirit of 1776 program series complements the Albany Institute’s exhibition Albany, c. 1776, which explores illustrates Albany’s role during the Revolutionary era.

Philadelphia-based living historian Michael Carver, the Regimental Brewmeister, has more than 30 years of home-brewing experience and has portrayed Revolutionary-era life for more than 15 years. Drawing on his background as a chemist, brewer, and reenactor, he brings the crafts, technologies, and everyday experiences of eighteenth-century America to life through engaging, hands-on programs.

 

Founding fathers and generals relied heavily on the use of cryptography, changing messages systematically to confuse intercepting readers. In this interactive program, participants of all ages will encode and decode messages using codes and cyphers while learning about famous Revolutionary spies.

This is an interactive program for visitors of all ages. The Spy Master will recruit and train spies and provide them with hands on exercises to practice their spycraft before being sent into the British encampments to collect intelligence. We will present several codes and cyphers for the participants to encode and decode messages, “dead drop” will be established in the environs of the site for our spies to exchange messages with other spies, and we will have discussions of famous spies in the employ of George Washington and General Howe.

Going into the Revolution, Americans were at a huge disadvantage to the European powers when it came to cryptography, many of which had been using secret offices where sensitive letters were opened and deciphered by public officials for centuries. It was not uncommon for the messages of Revolutionary leaders and American diplomats to be intercepted and read by their enemies, both at home and abroad. To combat this, many of our founding fathers and key generals relied heavily on the use of cryptography. Cryptography is split into two ways of changing the message systematically to confuse anyone who intercepts it: codes and ciphers. Many people believe, and use, the word code to mean the same thing as cipher, but technically they are different.

A code is a way of changing the message by replacing each word with another word that has a different meaning. For example, "Burn the City'' could become "Take the rubbish'' where the word "burn'' is represented by the codeword "take'', and similarly for "city'' and "rubbish''. Using codes requires a codebook, which contains all such codewords. Considering the large number of words in most languages, this is normally quite a large book, making the use of codes rather cumbersome (it is a bit like a French dictionary, giving the translation to and from the codeword). However, they can be used to encode key words in a message. Consider the message "Kill him as soon as possible''. With a simple change of a single word this becomes "Meet him as soon as possible'', which may pass through security detection without being noticed. So, although potentially hard to use, a simple code can be very effective, since even if the message is intercepted, they can be used so that the code reads as an innocent or unrelated topic.

Ciphers, on the other hand, convert the message by a rule, known only to the sender and recipient, which changes with each individual letter (or sometimes groups of letters). Ciphers, are significantly easier to use than codes, since the users only have to remember a specific algorithm (a mathematical word for process) to encrypt the message, and not a whole dictionary of codewords. The major setback for ciphers compared to codes is that if someone finds a message that has been encrypted using a cipher, the output is almost certainly going to be a random string of letters or symbols, and as such the interceptor will know straight away that someone wanted to hide this message.

Go back